1. Advancing the integration of environmental restorative justice in legal and policy frameworks
Advocate for the incorporation of environmental restorative justice principles, concepts, and goals into local, national, regional and international policymaking and legal frameworks, including sentencing and rehabilitation approaches. This includes reshaping responses within both extrajudicial and judicial processes and practices. To achieve this, we will undertake networking and collaborating with academics, policymakers, legal professionals and other suitable individuals and groups (e.g., advocacy NGOs, universities, legal aid organisations, etc.) to support the adoption and institutionalisation of environmental restorative justice.
2. Ensuring inclusive knowledge exchange in environmental restorative justice
Facilitate knowledge-sharing on environmental restorative justice practices, with a particular emphasis on learning from Indigenous communities and other marginalised groups. Recognising that their knowledge and experiences offer valuable insights, we approach this exchange with respect and openness, acknowledging that our own interpretations are not the only lens through which to understand environmental restorative justice. By creating a diverse and inclusive environment, we aim to learn from varied perspectives and experiences to strengthen the field through plural and relational approaches.
3. Prioritising emerging and innovative applications of environmental restorative justice
Explore emerging and innovative topics within environmental restorative justice, particularly its evolving intersections with pressing social and environmental challenges, including how we include the other-than-human perspectives and needs. This includes exploring its application in climate litigation brought by young people and marginalised communities. We will also consider restorative responses to climate change-induced migration, eco-anxiety, biodiversity loss/recovery, and corporate harms—both crimes and other harms that current legal frameworks fail to address. In relation to the penal system, we could examine the role of rehabilitation in post-agreement outcomes, nature-based prisons and restorative policing of environmental crimes. Additionally, we may explore how environmental restorative justice can respond to harms linked to artificial intelligence.
4. Strengthening the links between environmental restorative justice and broader social policies
Develop connections between environmental restorative justice and broader areas of restorative justice and social policies to promote socio-ecological, community-centred approaches to repairing and preventing environmental harm. Specifically, we want to understand how promoting environmental care and addressing climate change and biodiversity issues restoratively can be meaningfully integrated into the practices of restorative cities, businesses, schools, organisations working with children and young people, and others. We also aim to explore how environmental restorative justice methodologies can be applied in these areas.