1. Efficiency and evaluation of restorative justice programmes
This session discusses a) the types of evaluation-oriented research designs and methods used for evaluating restorative programmes and preferred by different actors, policy makers, practitioners (qualitative/ quantitative/ experimental/ critical), and their benefits and pitfalls? the different (research) methods used for evaluating programmes; b) the relation between evaluation method and type of crime or harms researched (eg. sexual violence, hate crime), and evaluation and the understanding of restorative justice used (process vs outcome); c) indicators and criteria of evaluation (ex. recidivism, satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, restoration, transformation) and indicators both from a policy makers and from a restorative justice point of view; d) coproduction of evaluation between researchers and practitioners.
2. The role of international organisations in popularising and fostering restorative justice cultures, practices, policies
This session delves into a) the role of international restorative justice organisations (such as EFRJ), and international institutions (such as EU, UN or CoE) in fostering restorative justice cultures, practices, policies, and ways in which can we assess that; b) on the types of cooperations which can support restorative aims (for example with other European or international organisations such as CEP, Victim Support Europe, Penal Reform International); c) on the collaborations between international restorative justice sister organisations (such as the National Association for Community and Restorative Justice, the Asia Pacific Forum for Restorative Justice, etc.); d) on the relation and affinity with other ‘social movements’ (environmental movement, BLM, …).
3. From evaluation towards the social impact of restorative justice
This session focuses on a) possible ways of assessing the social impact of restorative justice in society (ex. restorative cities, restorative schools, restorative workplaces); b) ways of differentiating between the (micro) impact on interpersonal relationships and neighbourhoods, the (meso) impact on institutions, and on the (macro) impact on society; c) ways of assessing the effect of the micro interventions on the meso or macrolevels of transformation; d) possible ways of researching cooperations and partnerships; ways of quantifying or qualifying the impact of social interventions.
4. Narrating the impact of restorative justice
This session discusses a) best examples of communicating research results to policy makers, to specific target groups, to society at large; b) potential collaborations between researchers, artists, practitioners, journalists to increase the potential of narrating the social impact of restorative justice; c) the role of the arts in increasing social impact; d) ways to communicate restorative justice better to the public.
